Back to Journals » Journal of Blood Medicine » Volume 15

Can COVID-19 Increase Platelet in Adult Immune Thrombocytopenia During the TPO-RA Administration? A Real-World Observational Study

Authors Wang X, Zhu Y, Liu D, Zhu L, Tong J , Zheng C 

Received 8 February 2024

Accepted for publication 27 April 2024

Published 7 May 2024 Volume 2024:15 Pages 217—225

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S457545

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Martin H Bluth



Xiaoyu Wang,* Yingqiao Zhu,* Dan Liu, Lijun Zhu, Juan Tong, Changcheng Zheng

Department of Hematology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Changcheng Zheng, Department of Hematology, the First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People’s Republic of China, Tel/Fax +86-551-62284476, Email [email protected]

Introduction: COVID-19 infection has brought new challenges to the treatment of adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). In adult ITP patients, there have been no relevant reports exploring the incidence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors of platelet elevation after COVID-19 infection.
Materials and Methods: A total of 66 patients with previously diagnosed ITP from December 2022 to February 2023 in a single-center were collected and analyzed for this real-world clinical retrospective observational study.
Results: In the platelet count increased group (n = 19), 13 patients (68.4%) were using thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA) treatment at the time of COVID-19 infection; the median platelet count was 52 (2– 207) × 109/L at the last visit before infection and 108 (19– 453) × 109/L at the first visit after infection. In the platelet count stable group (n = 19) and platelet count decreased group (n = 28), 9 (47.4%) and 8 (28.6%) patients were using TPO-RA at the time of infection, respectively. ITP patients treated with TPO-RA had a significantly higher risk of increased platelet count than those not treated with TPO-RA at the time of infection (platelet count increased group vs platelet count decreased group: OR: 5.745, p = 0.009; platelet count increased group vs the non-increased group: OR: 3.616, p = 0.031). In the platelet count increased group, the median platelet count at 6 months post-infection was 67 (14– 235) × 109/L, which was significantly higher than the platelet level at the last visit before infection (p = 0.040).
Conclusion: This study showed that some adult ITP patients had an increase in platelet count after COVID-19 infection, and this phenomenon was strongly associated with the use of TPO-RA at the time of infection. Although no thrombotic events were observed in this study, it reminds clinicians that they should be alert to the possibility of thrombotic events in the long-term management of adult ITP patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords: immune thrombocytopenia, thrombopoietin receptor agonists, COVID-19, thrombosis

Introduction

Since the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak in December 2019, the COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus has brought new challenges to the management of adult patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The occurrence and recurrence of ITP is closely associated with viral infections such as cytomegalovirus, hepatitis C virus (HCV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).1 Antibodies induced by viral infections may cross-react with platelets thereby leading to platelet destruction.2 COVID-19 infection has been identified as a risk factor for the development of ITP,3 and the occurrence and relapse of ITP induced by COVID-19 infection has been frequently reported.4–7 This may be related to the direct invasion of hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow by COVID-19, autoimmune destruction of platelets and increased platelet depletion due to the formation of microthrombi.8,9 Corticosteroids and high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) are the most commonly used regimens for the treatment of COVID-19 associated thrombocytopenia.

However, two small-sample cases studies found that patients with chronic ITP (cITP) develop early thrombocytosis after COVID-19 infection, which is common in cITP treated with thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RA).10,11 A single-center observational cohort study conducted at Beijing Children’s Hospital demonstrates a transient rise in platelet counts after COVID-19 infection in cITP children treated with TPO-RA.12 However, in adult ITP patients, there have been no relevant reports exploring the incidence, clinical characteristics, and risk factors of platelet elevation after COVID-19 infection. To further verify and explore the impact of COVID-19 infection in adult ITP patients, this study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of adult patients with ITP in our center from December 2022 to February 2023 to provide a reference for the management of adult ITP patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Materials and Methods

Data Collection

A total of 66 patients with previously diagnosed ITP in the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital) from December 2022 to February 2023 were collected for this real-world clinical retrospective observational study. Patient’s selection criteria: (1) diagnosed as ITP; (2) infected COVID-19 during this period; (3) age above 18 years old.

The diagnosis and follow-up information of ITP patients were obtained from the electronic medical record system or telephone follow-up. The data collected included demographic data, ITP treatment modalities, platelet count at the last visit before COVID-19 infection and platelet count at the first visit after COVID-19 infection. Platelet counts at 3 months and 6 months post-COVID-19 infection were tracked for ITP patients in the platelet count increased group. This study protocol was approved by the medical research ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2023-RE-322). Informed consent was waived by the medical research ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China because of retrospective nature of the study.

Classifications

According to the platelet counts of the patients at the first visit after COVID-19 infection, the patients were divided into platelet count increased group, platelet count stable group and platelet count decreased group. “Platelet count increased group” was defined as an increase of more than 20% in the platelet count at the first visit after COVID-19 infection compared with the last visit before infection. “Platelet count stable group” was defined as the platelet count fluctuating by less than 20% at the first visit after COVID-19 infection compared to the last visit before infection. “Platelet count decreased group” was defined as a decrease of more than 20% in the platelet count at the first visit after COVID-19 infection compared with the last visit before infection.

Definitions and Statistical Analysis

Newly diagnosed ITP (nITP) is defined for patients with ITP within 3 months of diagnosis; persistent ITP (pITP) is defined for patients with ITP lasting between 3 and 12 months from diagnosis; chronic ITP (cITP) is defined for patients with ITP lasting for more than 12 months.13 First-line treatment refers to conventional treatment with glucocorticoids and/or intravenous immunoglobulin to improve platelet count; second-line treatment involved the use of one or more of the following three therapies: thrombopoietic agents, rituximab, or splenectomy; third-line treatment refers to the use of therapeutic regimens supported by prospective multicenter clinical trials including decitabine, all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) in combination with danazol, and other drugs.14

Continuous variables were described as means and standard deviations or medians and ranges. Categorical variables were described as frequencies and proportions. Continuous variables were compared between groups by Kruskal–Wallis H-test. Test for association between categorical variables used by chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test (if applicable). The potential risk factors associated with fluctuation in platelet counts were further explored using binary logistic regression analysis. Increased, stable, or decreased platelet counts were used as dependent variables, and age, gender, whether corticosteroids were being used at the time of infection, and whether TPO-RA was being used at the time of infection as the independent variables. SPSS26.0 software was used for statistical analysis and differences were considered statistically significant at p< 0.05.

Results

Clinical Characteristics

A total of 66 adult ITP patients with COVID-19 infection were enrolled, including 25 (37.9%) males and 41 (62.1%) females, with an average age of 48±16 years. Among them, 10 patients (15.1%) had other autoimmune diseases (6 patients with undifferentiated connective tissue disease, 2 patients with hypothyroidism, 1 patient with Sjogren’s syndrome and 1 patient with Evans syndrome), and 3 patients (4.5%) underwent previous splenectomy. There were 11 patients (16.7%) with nITP, 16 patients (24.2%) with pITP, and 39 patients (59.1%) with cITP. Before COVID-19 infection, 18 patients (27.3%) of these patients had received no prior treatment, 10 patients (15.1%) had received first-line treatment, 37 patients (56.1%) had received second-line treatment, and 1 patient (1.5%) had received third-line treatment (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical Characteristics

At the time of COVID-19 infection, 11 patients (16.7%) received corticosteroids monotherapy, 22 patients (33.3%) received TPO-RA regimens monotherapy, 3 patients (4.6%) received corticosteroids and TPO-RA combinations and 7 patients (10.6%) received other combinations treatment. Twenty-three patients (34.8%) did not receive any regimens. TPO-RA using details were shown in Supplementary Table 1.

COVID-19 Infection and Platelet Count Fluctuation

The median platelet count of 66 ITP patients at the last visit before COVID-19 infection was 64 (2–246) ×109/L, and the median time from the last visit before infection to COVID-19 infection was 16 (1–110) days. The median platelet count at the first visit after infection was 40 (2–453) ×109/L, and the median time from COVID-19 infection to the first visit was 16 (1–82) days (Table 1). After COVID-19 infection, the platelet count of 19 patients (28.8%) increased by more than 20% compared with that before infection (platelet count increased group), of which 14 patients (73.7%) increased by more than 50%. The platelet count of 19 patients (28.8%) was stable which fluctuated within 20% compared with that before infection (platelet count stable group). Twenty-eight patients (42.4%) had a reduction in platelet count of more than 20% (platelet count decreased group), of which 17 (60.7%) patients had a decrease of 50% or more (Figure 1).

Figure 1 COVID-19 infection and platelet count fluctuation. After COVID-19 infection, the platelet count of 19 patients increased by more than 20% compared with that before infection, of which 14 patients increased by more than 50%. The platelet count of 19 patients was stable which fluctuated within 20% compared with that before infection. Twenty-eight patients had a reduction in platelet count of more than 20%, of which 17 patients had a decrease of 50% or more.

There were 19 patients in the platelet count increased group, including 6 (31.6%) males and 13 (68.4%) females, with an average age of 51±14 years. Among these patients, 2 patients (10.5%) were nITP, 4 patients (21.1%) were pITP, and 13 patients (68.4%) were cITP. One patient (5.3%) had received first-line treatment, 13 patients (68.4%) had received second-line treatment, 1 patient (5.3%) had received third-line treatment, and four patients (21.1%) had received no previous treatment. At the time of COVID-19 infection, 4 patients (21.1%) were using corticosteroids and 13 patients (68.4%) were using TPO-RA. The median platelet count at the last visit before infection was 52 (2–207) ×109/L, and the median platelet count at the first visit after infection was 108 (19–453)×109/L. The median time from the last visit before infection to COVID-19 infection was 13 (1–67) days, and the median time from infection to the first visit after infection was 20 (2–47) days (Table 2).

Table 2 Clinical Characteristics of the Increased, Stable and Decreased Platelet Count Groups

A total of 19 patients in the platelet count stable group include 8 (42.1%) males and 11 (57.9%) females, with an average age of 44±16 years. Of these patients, 9 (47.4%) were using TPO-RA at the time of infection. The median platelet count at the last visit before infection was 64 (14–246) × 109/L, and the median platelet count at the first visit after infection was 64 (12–259) ×109/L. The median time from the last visit before infection to COVID-19 infection was 20 (4–86) days, and the median time from infection to the first visit after infection was 21 (5–57) days (Table 2). There were 28 patients in the platelet count decreased group, including 11 (39.3%) males and 17 (60.7%) females, with a mean age of 48 ± 18 years. Among them, 8 patients (28.6%) were receiving TPO-RA before infection. The median platelet count at the last visit before infection was 71 (14–227) ×109/L, and the median platelet count at the first visit after infection was 23 (2–90) ×109/L. The median time from the last visit before infection to COVID-19 infection was 14 (2–110) days, and the median time from infection to the first visit after infection was 13 (1–82) days (Table 2).

Risk Assessment of Platelet Count Elevation After COVID-19 Infection

There were no significant differences in age, gender, ITP stage, previous treatment lines, use of corticosteroids at the time of infection, platelet count at the last visit before infection, the time from the last visit before infection to COVID-19 infection, and the time from COVID-19 infection to the first visit after infection among the ITP patients with above three groups. However, there was a significant difference in whether TPO-RA was being used at the time of infection (p=0.020) (Table 2).

ITP patients treated with TPO-RA had a significantly higher risk of increased platelet count than those not treated with TPO-RA at the time of infection [platelet count increased group vs platelet count decreased group: OR (95% CI): 5.745 (1.556–21.216), p=0.009; platelet count increased group vs the non-increased group (stable and decreased groups): OR (95% CI): 3.616 (1.123–11.648), p=0.031] (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Risk factors of ITP patients with increased platelet count after COVID-19 infection.

Dynamics of Platelet Levels in Patients in the Platelet Count Increased Group

In the platelet count increased group, the median platelet count at the first visit after COVID-19 infection was 108 (19–453)×109/L, which was significantly higher than that at the last visit before infection [52 (2–207)×109/L] (p<0.001)(Figure 3A). The median platelet count at 3 months post-infection was 58 (9–240) ×109/L, which was slightly higher than that at the last visit before infection (p=0.180)(Figure 3B). The median platelet count at 6 months post-infection was 67 (14–235) × 109/L, which was significantly higher than the platelet level at the last visit before infection (p=0.040)(Figure 3C). Although platelet counts at 3 months and 6 months after infection were significantly lower than those at the first visit after infection (p=0.011, 0.038) (Figure 3D); however, there was no difference between platelet counts at 3 months and 6 months (p=0.561) (Figure 3D).

Figure 3 Changes of platelet counts in patients of platelet count increased group. Platelet counts at the first visit after COVID-19 infection compared with the last visit before infection (A). Platelet counts at the 3 months after COVID-19 infection compared with the last visit before infection (B). Platelet counts at the 6 months after COVID-19 infection compared with the last visit before infection (C). Platelet counts at the first visit, at the 3 months and 6 months after COVID-19 infection which compared with each other (D).

Discussion

In this study, 28.8% of adult ITP patients had an increase in platelet count after COVID-19 infection (more than 20% above baseline). Logistic regression analysis showed that platelet count elevation was strongly associated with the use of TPO-RA. This is consistent with two previous small-sample cases studies,10,11 and a study of pediatric ITP patients that reported a transient increase in platelet counts after COVID-19 infection in cITP patients treated with TPO-RA;12 the peak rise in platelet counts occurred 1–2 weeks after COVID-19 infection, and platelet counts returned to pre-infection levels 3–4 weeks after infection.10–12 However, this study indicated that, in the platelet count increased group, platelet counts elevation mostly occurred within 1 month after COVID-19 infection; the platelet count was slightly increased at 3 months after infection and the platelet count was still at a higher level at 6 months after infection when compared with that before infection (p=0.180, 0.040).

TPO-RA use synergized with cytokines and lymphopenia caused by COVID-19 infection might contribute to the elevation of platelet count in ITP patients. After COVID-19 infection, there was a significant increase in the levels of many inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, IL-11 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF-α).15 Related studies have shown that these cytokines could promote megakaryocyte production,16 and Stone et al suggested that IL-6 promotes megakaryopoiesis by stimulating hepatic TPO expression.17 In addition, SARS-CoV-2 virus can directly infect and induce apoptosis of lymphocytes and relevant studies have shown a decrease in peripheral blood lymphocytes in COVID-19-infected patients, especially CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes,18 which leads to a decrease in platelet antibody production and further reduces platelet destruction. In the future, we will further expand the sample size and further analyse whether the duration, dose and frequency of TPO-RA use affects the extent of platelet increase.

This study suggested that COVID-19 infection in ITP patients treated with TPO-RA may lead to a further increase in platelet counts. Although no thrombotic events were observed in this study, it reminds clinicians that they should be paid close attention to the possibility of thrombotic events in the long-term management of ITP. Firstly, although ITP is an acquired autoimmune hemorrhagic disease, ITP itself is also a high-risk factor for thrombosis;19 a meta-analysis of three large population-based observational studies which conducted in Denmark, the United Kingdom and the United States indicated that the annual incidence of arterial and venous thrombotic events in patients with ITP ranged from 1.0 to 2.8 per 100 and 0.4 to 0.7 per 100, respectively, which were significantly higher than that in non-ITP patients (0.7 to 1.8 per 100 patients and 0.1 to 0.4 per 100 patients, respectively).20 Secondly, pro-inflammatory cytokines release, platelet adhesion and aggregation, endothelial inflammation and injury, thrombin generation caused by SARS-CoV-2 virus infection might lead to immunothrombosis.21,22 Epidemiologic studies indicated a high incidence of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs), including deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), in patients with COVID-19;23–25 COVID-19 might also be associated with an increased incidence of arterial thrombotic events such as ischemic stroke and limb ischemia, especially in patients with severe COVID-19.26–28 Thirdly, TPO-RA increases platelet production by binding to and activating the thrombopoietin receptor on the membrane of megakaryocytes.29 Studies have shown that the incidence of arterial and venous thrombotic events in cITP patients treated with TPO-RA is 2 to 3 times higher than that in patients who do not receive TPO-RA,30,31 which may be related to megakaryocyte activation and platelet production rapid elevation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study showed that some adult ITP patients had an increase in platelet count after COVID-19 infection, and this phenomenon was strongly associated with the use of TPO-RA at the time of infection. However, there are some limitations in this study. First, this was a retrospective study with a small sample size and the follow-up time was relatively short. In addition, there is no clear and uniform time point which designed for observing the platelet levels fluctuation after COVID-19 infection due to the essence of retrospective research, resulting in the possibility that the recording of platelet counts after infection may be somewhat biased from the actual situation. Finally, this study did not focus on the changes of coagulation function, including D-dimer levels, in patients with elevated platelet counts during the follow-up period; therefore, there is insufficient data to prove the possibility of thrombotic events in this group patients.

Abbreviations

ITP, Thrombocytopenia; TPO-RA, Thrombopoietin receptor agonists; COVID-19, Novel coronavirus; cITP, Chronic ITP; nITP, Newly diagnosed ITP; pITP, Persistent ITP; ATRA, All-trans retinoic acid; TNF-α, Tumor necrosis factor; VTEs, Venous thromboembolic events; DVT, Deep vein thrombosis; PE, Pulmonary embolism.

Data Sharing Statement

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Ethics and Consent to Participate

This study was approved by the ethics committees of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China and was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2023-RE-322). Informed consent was waived by the medical research ethics committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China because of retrospective nature of the study. All data were secured, protected, and accessed only for the authors. Personal information relating to the data that identifies the research subject is replaced with a numerical number. The descriptive data were summarized by tables and figures.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Franchini M, Veneri D, Lippi G. Thrombocytopenia and infections. Expert Rev Hematol. 2017;10(1):99–106. doi:10.1080/17474086.2017.1271319

2. Zufferey A, Kapur R, Semple JW. Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Mechanisms in Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP). J Clin Med. 2017;6(2):16. doi:10.3390/jcm6020016

3. Bomhof G, Mutsaers P, Leebeek FWG, et al. COVID-19-associated immune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol. 2020;190(2):e61–e64. doi:10.1111/bjh.16850

4. Auteri G, Paglia S, Mazzoni C, et al. Immune thrombocytopenia onset and relapse during the COVID-19 pandemic. A monocenter study. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2023;15(1):e2023029. doi:10.4084/mjhid.2023.029

5. Boehm BA, Packer CD. Persistent relapsing immune thrombocytopenia following COVID-19 infection. Cureus. 2022;14(7):e27133. doi:10.7759/cureus.27133

6. Alharbi MG, Alanazi N, Yousef A, et al. COVID-19 associated with immune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expert Rev Hematol. 2022;15(2):157–166. doi:10.1080/17474086.2022.2029699

7. Rampotas A, Watson E, Burton K, et al. A real-world study of immune thrombocytopenia management during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK. Br J Haematol. 2022;196(2):351–355. doi:10.1111/bjh.17804

8. Murt A, Eskazan AE, Yılmaz U, et al. COVID-19 presenting with immune thrombocytopenia: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Virol. 2021;93(1):43–45. doi:10.1002/jmv.26138

9. Singh S, Sharma R, Singh J, et al. Thrombocytopenia in COVID-19: focused summary of current understanding of mechanisms and clinical implications. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2021;43(7):243–248. doi:10.1097/MPH.0000000000002264

10. de la Cruz-Benito B, Rivas-Pollmar MI, Álvarez Román MT, et al. Paradoxical effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with immune thrombocytopenia. Br J Haematol. 2021;192(6):973–977. doi:10.1111/bjh.17077

11. Pantic N, Suvajdzic-Vukovic N, Virijevic M, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenia on thrombopoietin receptor agonists: new perspectives and old challenges. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2022;33(1):51–55. doi:10.1097/mbc.0000000000001109

12. Wang Z, Cheng X, Wang N, et al. Transient increase in platelet counts associated with COVID-19 infection during TPO-RA as the second-line treatment in children with ITP. Br J Haematol. 2023;203(3):384–388. doi:10.1111/bjh.19040

13. Rodeghiero F, Stasi R, Gernsheimer T, et al. Standardization of terminology, definitions and outcome criteria in immune thrombocytopenic purpura of adults and children: report from an international working group. Blood. 2009;113(11):2386–2393. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-07-162503

14. Neunert C, Terrell DR, Arnold DM, et al. American Society of Hematology 2019 guidelines for immune thrombocytopenia. Blood Adv. 2019;3(23):3829–3866. doi:10.1182/bloodadvances.2019000966

15. Chen LYC, Hoiland RL, Stukas S, et al. Confronting the controversy: interleukin-6 and the COVID-19 cytokine storm syndrome. Eur Respir J. 2020;56(4):2003006. doi:10.1183/13993003.03006-2020

16. Behrens K, Alexander WS. Cytokine control of megakaryopoiesis. Growth Factors. 2018;36(3–4):89–103. doi:10.1080/08977194.2018.1498487

17. Stone RL, Nick AM, McNeish IA, et al. Paraneoplastic thrombocytosis in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(7):610–618. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1110352

18. Zhang S, Asquith B, Szydlo R, et al. Peripheral T cell lymphopenia in COVID-19: potential mechanisms and impact. Immunother Adv. 2021;1(1):ltab015. doi:10.1093/immadv/ltab015

19. Nørgaard M. Thrombosis in patients with primary chronic immune thrombocytopenia. Thromb Res. 2012;130(Suppl 1):S74–S75. doi:10.1016/j.thromres.2012.08.282

20. Langeberg WJ, Schoonen WM, Eisen M, et al. Thromboembolism in patients with immune thrombocytopenia (ITP): a meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Hematol. 2016;103(6):655–664. doi:10.1007/s12185-016-1974-6

21. Mroueh A, Fakih W, Carmona A, et al. COVID-19 promotes endothelial dysfunction and thrombogenicity: role of proinflammatory cytokines/SGLT2 prooxidant pathway. J Thromb Haemost. 2023;22(1):286–299. doi:10.1016/j.jtha.2023.09.022

22. Iba T, Connors JM, Levy JH. The coagulopathy, endotheliopathy, and vasculitis of COVID-19. Inflamm Res. 2020;69(12):1181–1189. doi:10.1007/s00011-020-01401-6

23. Babkina AS, Yadgarov MY, Volkov AV, et al. Spectrum of thrombotic complications in fatal cases of COVID-19: focus on pulmonary artery thrombosis in situ. Viruses. 2023;15(8):1681. doi:10.3390/v15081681

24. Soudet S, Basille D, Carette H, et al. Cardiovascular and venous thromboembolic events after hospital discharge for COVID-19: a prospective single center study. Angiology. 2023:33197231196175. doi:10.1177/00033197231196175

25. Honkanen M, Sirkeoja S, Viskari H, et al. Risk of venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 infection. Intern Med J. 2023;53(8):1478–1480. doi:10.1111/imj.16145

26. Glober N, Stewart L, Seo J, et al. Incidence and characteristics of arterial thromboemboli in patients with COVID-19. Thromb J. 2021;19(1):104. doi:10.1186/s12959-021-00357-9

27. Gonzalez-Urquijo M, Gonzalez-Rayas JM, Castro-Varela A, et al. Unexpected arterial thrombosis and acute limb ischemia in COVID-19 patients. Results from the Ibero-Latin American acute arterial thrombosis registry in COVID-19: (ARTICO-19). Vascular. 2022;30(6):1107–1114. doi:10.1177/17085381211052033

28. Tayebi P, Zavareh MSH, Tayyebi G, et al. Extensive acute lower extremity arterial thrombosis: a major thrombus formation caused by COVID-19. Vasc Specialist Int. 2021;37:36. doi:10.5758/vsi.210039

29. Imbach P, Crowther M. Thrombopoietin-receptor agonists for primary immune thrombocytopenia. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(8):734–741. doi:10.1056/NEJMct1014202

30. Tjepkema M, Amini S, Schipperus M. Risk of thrombosis with thrombopoietin receptor agonists for ITP patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2022;171:103581. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103581

31. Garabet L, Ghanima W, Monceyron Jonassen C, et al. Effect of thrombopoietin receptor agonists on markers of coagulation and P-selectin in patients with immune thrombocytopenia. Platelets. 2019;30(2):206–212. doi:10.1080/09537104.2017.1394451

Creative Commons License © 2024 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.